Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options

Summary Report Hair Analysis Panel Discussion Exploring The State Of The Science

Hair Analysis Panel Discussion: Section 5.1

Historical Document

This Web site is provided by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ONLY as an historical reference for the public health community. It is no longer being maintained and the data it contains may no longer be current and/or accurate.

Section 5
5.1 Pharmacokinetic Issues

The group acknowledged that little is known about the transfer kinetics of substances into hair (i.e., their "normal" percolation or rate of appearance in hair). Factors such as transit times, pools in the body, permeability of basal membranes, and co-factors that may be involved in transit are not known. Without this knowledge, interpretation of hair analysis results is greatly limited. Individual panelist input focused on possible ways to fill data gaps. Specifically:

Hair is a nonvascular tissue (separate from liquid phase transfer kinetics). Understanding the rate of uptake in the hair, if any, for substances of interest is of critical importance. Experimental models are needed (RB, MK).

Implanting human hair on hairless mice, administering a radioactive isotope, and following its movement to hair may be an effective method for determining the incorporation of metals into hair (TC).

Studying the uptake of arsenite used in the treatment of leukemia might be a possible human model to use to increase our understanding of pharmacokinetics and dose-response relationships, realizing that administered doses are much higher than they would ever be expected in an environmental setting (MK).

Identifying the "transportable" form or metabolite(s) of substances of interest may provide the best biomarker. Methyl mercury may serve as a model. The key is understanding the transport mechanism. It may be worthwhile to pursue organo metals and their behavior (e.g, dimethyl arsenic acid, butyl tin); they may serve as more unique markers of exposure (TC, MK, SS, LW).

When interpreting data, studying nutritional status should be considered because it may play a role in the uptake and distribution of metals. For example, iron and calcium can increase the uptake of lead into the hair. Zinc levels in hair may be high in "failure to thrive" cases because hair has stopped growing (LW, SS).

Obtaining data to better correlate exposure, blood/urine, and hair levels would enable a better understanding of the relationship of elements in the various body compartments. It would help correlate external concentration with internal doses. Few such data exist, with the exception of NHANES data, which evaluate lead levels across hair, blood, and urine (which correlated poorly). It was speculated that such substance-specific relationships could be studied further as part of the NHANES program (DP, LW).


Next | Table of Contents

Top of Page

 
Contact Us:
  • Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
    4770 Buford Hwy NE
    Atlanta, GA 30341-3717 USA
  • 800-CDC-INFO
    (800-232-4636)
    TTY: (888) 232-6348
    Email CDC-INFO
  • New Hours of Operation
    8am-8pm ET/Monday-Friday
    Closed Holidays
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, Atlanta, GA 30341
Contact CDC: 800-232-4636 / TTY: 888-232-6348

A-Z Index

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
  27. #