Breastfeeding in the United States: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2006

NCHS Data Brief No. 5, April 2008

PDF Version (500 KB)

by Margaret M. McDowell, M.P.H., R.D.; Chia-Yih Wang, Ph.D.; and Jocelyn Kennedy-Stephenson, M.S.

 

Key findings

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys

• The percentage of infants who were ever breastfed increased from 60% among infants who were born in 1993-1994 to 77% among infants who were born in 2005-2006.
• Breastfeeding rates increased significantly among non-Hispanic black women from 36% in 1993-1994 to 65% in 2005-2006.
• Breastfeeding rates in 1999-2006 were significantly higher among those with higher income (74%) compared with those who had lower income (57%).
• Breastfeeding rates among mothers 30 years and older were significantly higher than those of younger mothers.
• There was no significant change in the rate of breastfeeding at 6 months of age for infants born between 1993 and 2004.

Human milk is the ideal food for most infants. Breastfeeding benefits infants and their mothers (1). Breastfed infants receive anti-bodies from breast milk, which protect against infection in the early postpartum period, and breastfeeding is less expensive than formula feeding. This report summarizes information on breastfeeding rates in the United States based on data from the 1999-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). Results are reported for the total U.S. population and three race-ethnic groups by birth year cohort.

Keywords: Breastfeeding, Prevalence, Trends, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

 

Have breastfeeding rates in the United States changed over time?

Breastfeeding rates have increased in the United States.

 

 

Breastfeeding rates in the United States increased significantly between 1993 and 2006. The percentage of infants who were ever breastfed increased from 60% among infants born in 1993-1994 to 77% among infants born in 2005-2006.

For infants born in 2005-2006, the percent who were ever breastfed exceeded the Healthy People 2010 target of 75% (2).

 

Are children from some population subgroups more likely to be breastfed than others?

Mexican American and non-Hispanic white children were significantly more likely to have been breastfed compared with non-Hispanic black children in each birth year cohort.

In the 2005-2006 birth cohort group, 65% of non-Hispanic black infants were breastfed compared with 80% of Mexican American and 79% of non-Hispanic white infants.

Although breastfeeding rates were significantly lower among non-Hispanic black infants, significant increases in breastfeeding rates have occurred in this group.

The percent of non-Hispanic black infants who were ever breastfed increased from 36% for those born in 1993-1994 to 65% for those born in 2005-2006.

The observed increases in breastfeeding rates for non-Hispanic white and Mexican-American infants were not statistically significant.

 

 

Do breastfeeding rates differ by other sociodemographic characteristics?

Breastfeeding rates were lower for infants in low income families.

Breastfeeding rates were examined by income status group. Income status was defined using the poverty income ratio (PIR), an index calculated by dividing family income by a poverty threshold that is specific for family size (3). Low income was defined as PIR less than or equal to 1.85, and high income was defined as PIR greater than 1.85. For the total population, the proportion of infants who were ever breastfed was lower among infants whose families had lower income (57%) compared with infants whose families had higher income status (74%).

The differences in breastfeeding rates by family income status were only observed among non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black infants, but not among Mexican-American infants.

Within each income group, the breastfeeding rates for non-Hispanic black infants were significantly lower compared with the breastfeeding rates among non-Hispanic white and Mexican-American infants.

 

 

Infants whose mothers were younger were less likely to have been breastfed.

Breastfeeding rates increased significantly with increasing maternal age overall and for all race-ethnicity groups. The breastfeeding rates of mothers who were under 20 years of age (43%) were lower compared with mothers who were 30 years and older (75%) or 20-29 years of age (65%).

Within maternal age groups, there were race-ethnicity differences in breastfeeding rates. Mexican-American infants who were born to mothers who were less than 20 years of age had a significantly higher breastfeeding rate (66%) compared with non-Hispanic white (40%) and non-Hispanic black infants (30%). Non-Hispanic black infants whose mothers were 20-29 years or 30 years and older were significantly less likely to be breastfed than their non-Hispanic white and Mexican American counterparts.

 

 

Has there been a change in the United States in the proportion of infants who are still breastfed at 6 months of age?

There was no significant change in the rate of breastfeeding at 6 months of age for infants born between 1993 and 2004.

The rates of breastfeeding at 6 months of age were computed for each birth year cohort using information from NHANES 1999-2004 for infants 6 months of age and older. The NHANES 2005-2006 data were not included in the analysis because the sample size for the birth year cohort was too small to produce reliable estimates.

Overall, the rates of breastfeeding at 6 months of age were significantly higher among Mexican-American (40%) and non-Hispanic white infants (35%) compared with non-Hispanic black infants (20%), but the rates for Mexican-American and non-Hispanic white infants were not significantly different.

The Healthy People 2010 target goal for breastfeeding at 6 months of age is 50% (2). None of the race-ethnicity groups achieved the target goal.

 

 

Summary

Breastfeeding rates in the United States have increased significantly among infants born between 1993-1994 and 2005-2006. In 2005-2006 the rates of breastfeeding exceeded the Healthy People 2010 goal of 75%. The rates of breastfeeding at 6 months of age did not achieve the Healthy People 2010 target goal of 50% (2). Breastfeeding rates were associated with race-ethnicity, maternal age, and family income status, thus underscoring the need to continue breastfeeding promotion and intervention activities that target diverse populations.

Diet is an integral component of infant and child growth and development, and healthy feeding practices have benefits that continue into childhood and adolescence. Breastfeeding benefits mothers and babies. Information on breastfeeding is posted on the HHS Blueprint for Action on Breastfeeding website (4).

 

Definitions

Breastfeeding was defined as ever having been breastfed or received breast milk.

Ever breastfed was defined by the following question: “Was {name of the infant/child} ever breastfed or fed breast milk?” The question was part of the Diet Behavior and Nutrition (DBQ) section of the NHANES household questionnaire (5).

Breastfed at 6 months was defined by the following question: “How old was {name of infant/child} when {he/she} completely stopped breastfeeding or being fed breast milk?” The question was part of the Diet Behavior and Nutrition (DBQ) section of the NHANES household questionnaire (5). All infants and children 6 months of age and older were included in the analysis. Infants and children who stopped breastfeeding or being fed breast milk after 6 months of age were considered to be breastfed at 6 months of age.

Poverty status was defined using the poverty income ratio (PIR) criterion (3). A PIR cut-point of 1.85 was chosen because this is the income cut-point used to determine eligibility in The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women Infants and Children (WIC) (6).

 

Data source and methods

NHANES is a continuous survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized U.S. population. The survey is conducted to assess the health and nutritional status of the U.S. population. Survey participants are asked to complete household interview and health examination components. The annual interviewed and examined samples include approximately 5,000 persons of all ages. In 1999-2006, non-Hispanic blacks, Mexican Americans, adolescents 12-19 years, adults 60 years and older, and persons with low income were oversampled to improve the reliability of the statistical estimates for these groups.

This report is based on an analysis of household interview data. English and Spanish language questionnaires were used. A proxy respondent, usually one of the child’s parents, answered the breastfeeding and infant feeding questions for infants and children from birth through 6 years of age.

Birth cohort groups, which were based on date of birth were created for each 2-year survey period. The sample sizes for each of the birth cohorts are as follows:

 

Birth Cohort Group	1993-1994	1995-1996	1997-1998	1999-2000	2001-2002	2003-2004	2005-2006
Sample size	369	793	1,409	2,040	1,641	1,182	434

 

The survey sample weights were used for all analyses. The sample weights account for the differential probabilities of selection, nonresponse, and noncoverage. The weights are incorporated into the estimation process. The standard errors of the percentages were estimated using Taylor series linearization, a method that incorporates the sample weights and sample design.

Differences between groups were evaluated using a univariate t-statistic. Trend tests were done to evaluate changes in the estimates over time. All significance tests were two-sided using p <0.05 as the level of statistical significance. All comparison findings reported are statistically significant unless otherwise indicated. All data analyses were performed using the statistical packages SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.) and SUDAAN version 9.0 (RTI, Research Triangle Park, N.C.).

 

About the authors

Margaret A. McDowell and Chia-Yih Wang are with the Division of Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Jocelyn Kennedy-Stephenson is with Northrop Grumman under contract to the National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 

References

1. American Academy of Pediatrics Policy. Statement on breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 2005; 115(2), 496-506. [Accessed 2/20/08].
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. [Accessed 2/20/08].
3. U.S. Census Bureau. Poverty thresholds for 2006 by size of family and number of related children under 18 years. 2007. [Accessed 2/20/08].
4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. HHS blueprint for action on breastfeeding [PDF – 819 KB]. Washington, DC: U.S. DHHS, Office of Women’s Health. 2000. [Accessed 1/20/10].
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Questionnaire Data. Diet behavior and nutrition (DBQ) section. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999-2006. Available from: NHANES Questionnaires, Datasets, and Related Documentation [Accessed 2/20/08].
6. U.S. Department of Agriculture. The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). Nutrition program facts [PDF – 30 KB]. [Accessed 2/20/08].

 

Suggested citation

McDowell MA, Wang C-Y, Kennedy-Stephenson J. Breastfeeding in the United States: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1999-2006. NCHS data briefs, no. 5, Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2008.

 

Copyright information

All material appearing in this report is in the public domain and may be reproduced or copied without permission; citation as to source, however, is appreciated.

 

National Center for Health Statistics

Director – Edward J. Sondik, Ph.D.

Acting Co-Deputy Directors – Jennifer H. Madans, Ph.D., and Michael H. Sadagursky