|  
  
 |  
 |  
  Volume 
          3: 
          No. 4, October 2006 
ORIGINAL RESEARCHBody Mass Index and Blood Pressure Screening in a Rural Public School
  System: the Healthy Kids Project
William E. Moore, PhD, Aietah Stephens, MS, Terry Wilson, MHR, Wesley
  Wilson, MHR, June E. Eichner, PhDSuggested citation for this article: Moore WE, Stephens A, 
  Wilson T, Wilson W, Eichner JE. Body mass index and blood pressure screening in a rural public
  school system: the Healthy Kids Project. Prev Chronic Dis [serial online] 2006
  Oct [date cited]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/oct/05_0236.htm.
 PEER REVIEWED AbstractIntroductionAll students (N = 2053) in Anadarko public schools, grades kindergarten through 12, were invited to be screened for height, weight, and blood pressure to assess the health status of this multiracial, multiethnic (American Indian, white, African American, and Hispanic) population in southwestern Oklahoma.
 MethodsThe
  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2000 growth charts were used to determine body mass index (BMI) percentiles, and standards from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on Hypertension Control in Children and Adolescents were used to assess blood pressure.
 ResultsSeven hundred sixty-nine students with active consent participated in the
  screening. Of these, approximately 28% were overweight. American Indians were
  at significantly greater risk of being overweight or at risk for overweight
  than whites (relative risk  [RR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–1.7) as
  were African Americans (RR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.0), whereas Hispanics (RR,
  1.3; 95% CI, 0.9–2.0) did not have a statistically significant increased
  risk compared with whites. BMI at or above the 95th percentile was strongly associated with
  elevated blood pressure (≥90th percentile) (RR, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.6–5.4).
 ConclusionStudents who participated in this BMI screening in the Anadarko public
  school system evidenced high rates of excess weight, with American Indians and
  African Americans at greatest risk. Elevated BMI was strongly
  associated with elevated blood pressure.
 Back to top IntroductionThe Healthy Kids Project is an ongoing height, weight, and blood pressure
  screening project in the Anadarko, Okla, public school system. The project
  originated from discussions about health issues at a quarterly meeting of the
  University of Oklahoma Prevention Research Center’s (OUPRC’s) Community
  Advisory Board (CAB). A member of the CAB commented that while examining
  children in her role as a nurse for the public schools, she noticed many
  overweight children with acanthosis nigricans, defined in The Merck
  Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy as “a velvety hyperpigmentation on the
  neck, axillae, and groin” that “is probably the skin manifestation of
  severe and chronic hyperinsulinemia” (1). She also suspected that many
  children might be hypertensive based on blood pressure readings of children
  she examined for routine health problems. A collaboration
  among the CAB, OUPRC, and the Anadarko public schools was established to
  investigate these observations. A plan was implemented to offer screening to
  all children in the Anadarko public schools to determine the prevalence of
  overweight and elevated blood pressure. The group decided that the
  results of this screening should be presented to the administration of the
  school system to be used in policy decisions related to children’s health in
  the district and that individual results would be given to parents of students who participated in the screening. The United States has experienced an epidemic increase in the prevalence of
  adult obesity in the past decade (2-4). The 1999–2000 National Health and Nutrition
  Examination Survey estimates that approximately 64.5% of adults are overweight
  (body mass index [BMI] ≥25 kg/m2) and that approximately
  30.5% are obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) (5). Children and adolescents 
  have not been spared; the survey indicates that approximately 15.3% of 
  children and 15.5% of adolescents are
  overweight (BMI ≥95th percentile for age and sex) (5). Analysis of data 
  from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth shows that some racial groups 
  and geographic areas have even higher prevalence rates of overweight.
  Hispanic (21.8%) and African American (21.5%) youths had appreciably higher
  rates than non-Hispanic white (12.3%) youths, and the southern states had the
  highest prevalence (17.1%) among geographic regions (6). Recent results of the
  screening of all public school children in Arkansas (21% overweight) and
  surveys in Texas (20%–21% overweight) also indicate a higher prevalence of
  overweight in these states (7-9). Although there are many studies from
  different geographic areas indicating that American Indian children have a
  greater prevalence of obesity than white children, national data with an
  appropriate sample do not exist (4,10).  Given the increases in weight for height and age, accompanying blood
  pressure elevations may be expected. A recent investigation of public school
  students aged 10 to 19 years in Houston, Tex, demonstrated that hypertension is
  associated with excess weight and that the prevalence of hypertension may be
  increasing. However, this study did not include children aged 5 to 9 years or
  American Indians (8). Recent increases in childhood and adolescent obesity have paralleled
  large increases in childhood and adolescent type 2 diabetes (11-13). This
  increase portends possible increases in other chronic conditions associated
  with childhood and adolescent obesity, such as asthma, sleep apnea, and
  gallbladder disease (11). The importance of stopping the epidemic of childhood
  obesity also stems from the association of obesity with adult cardiovascular
  disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes. Obesity is a risk factor for both diseases. 
	There is evidence that overweight children become overweight
  adults, and this association becomes stronger the longer obesity persists
  during childhood. This association suggests that obesity among children is a long-term risk factor 
	and may indicate earlier onset
  of adult disease (14-17). Being overweight as an adult is also associated with
  elevated blood pressure, and there are several reports that hypertension is
  increasing among American Indian adults in the Southwest (18-23). Other CVD risk factors also cluster with obesity in children. The Bogalusa
  Heart Study showed strong positive associations between BMI, blood pressure,
  and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and showed a negative association
  between BMI and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (24).  The Anadarko School District provides an exceptional opportunity to examine 
  the relationship between
  weight and blood pressure status among American Indian, white, Hispanic, and
  African American students living in the same rural community. This
  investigation can generate data of broad scientific interest while also
  providing much needed information for the school district, students, and
  their parents. Back to top MethodsSettingThe Anadarko School District, in southwestern Oklahoma, has a total population of
  9370. The 2000 U.S. Census, using mutually exclusive racial and ethnic
  categories, indicates that 41.9% percent of respondents identified
  themselves as white, 37.9% as American Indian, 5.3% as African American, 0.2%
  as Asian, 6.3% as multiracial, and 8.4% as Hispanic or Latino. The school-aged
  population (5–19 years) represented 40.3% of the American Indian population
  and 19.3% of the white population (25). The median 1999 household income in
  the school district was $26,540, approximately 79% of the Oklahoma median and
  63% of the U.S. median (26). American Indian, African American, and
  Hispanic households had 83%, 86%, and 74%, respectively, of the income of
  white households (25). The Anadarko public school systemThe public school system consists of six schools: three elementary schools
  (one for kindergarten and first grade, one for second and third grades, and one
  for fourth and fifth grades), one middle school (sixth through eighth grades),
  one high school (ninth through twelfth grades), and one alternative high
  school. Approximately 2053 students were enrolled during the 2001 to 2002
  school year. The racial and ethnic composition of the student body was 60.5%
  American Indian, 28.8% white, 4.8% African American, and 5.8% Hispanic or
  Latino. Girls comprised 49.4% of the student body and boys 50.6%.
  Seventy-seven percent of the students were eligible for free or reduced-price
  lunches in 2001, 1.58 times the Oklahoma average (27). ParticipantsWe recruited participants from the Anadarko student population during the annual 
	enrollment day for the 2001 to 2002 school year. A 
	recruitment letter and consent/assent form were included in the enrollment 
	package that each parent or guardian is required to pick up and complete 
	before the start of each school year. Students were also recruited through 
	distribution of the letter and form at each school while screening was 
	being conducted. We returned to each school until all those with 
	consent/assent forms were screened or we were notified that they had moved. 
	Active parental or guardian consent and child assent were obtained in accordance with the project protocol
  approved by the University of Oklahoma’s Health Sciences Center
  Institutional Review Board. Data were collected on 769 students. Measures Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 centimeter using a SECA Road Rod
  stadiometer, and weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kilogram using a SECA
  770 digital scale (SECA Corp, Hanover, Md). Both height and weight were
  measured with shoes, coats, and other heavy outerwear removed.
  BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.
  One investigator measured the height and weight of approximately 85% of the
  participants, and all field measurements were obtained by individuals trained
  and supervised by this investigator. BMI and sex- and age-specific BMI
  percentiles were calculated using the Centers for Disease Control and
  Prevention’s (CDC’s) Epi Info software and its 2000 growth chart
  database (28). The BMI percentiles were stratified into sex- and age-specific
  classifications based on CDC’s 2000 growth charts as follows: underweight
  (<5th percentile), normal weight (≥5th percentile but <85th percentile), at risk of
  overweight (≥85th percentile but <95th percentile), and overweight (≥95th
  percentile). Blood pressure was categorized according to the classifications described
  by the 1996 National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on
  Hypertension Control in Children and Adolescents Report (29). The
  classifications are defined according to the following age, sex, and height
  specific blood pressure percentiles from normative tables based on one blood
  pressure measurement: normal (systolic and diastolic blood pressure <90th
  percentile), high normal (systolic or diastolic ≥90th percentile but
  <95th percentile), and hypertensive (systolic or diastolic ≥95th
  percentile). Classification is based on the highest categorization of
  either systolic or diastolic blood pressure. The report also states that a
  diagnosis of hypertension should be based on the average of at least two
  measurements per measurement occasion on at least three separate occasions
  over weeks or months and that a mercury sphygmomanometer should be used. It is
  inferred that an assessment of normal blood pressure requires only one
  measurement. Blood pressure was measured using an Omron HEM-907 IntelliSense (Omron
  Healthcare, Inc, Vernon Hills, Ill) electronic digital blood pressure monitor
  with appropriately sized cuff. Blood pressure measurement began after the
  student sat quietly for 3 minutes. This measurement was recorded. For
  participants younger than 18 years, age-, sex-, and height-specific tables for
  the 90th (high normal) and 95th (hypertensive) percentile systolic and
  diastolic blood pressures were consulted to determine blood pressure
  classification (29). Students were considered to have elevated blood pressure
  if their systolic or diastolic blood pressure was in at least the 90th
  percentile. If the student’s systolic and diastolic blood pressure were
  normal, blood pressure was recorded, and the student’s blood pressure
  measurement was concluded. However, the blood pressure was retaken after 1
  minute if the first measurement was elevated. The process was repeated one 
  more time if the blood pressure remained elevated. Some elevated blood 
  pressures were missed during the process of examining blood pressure tables in 
  a field setting; however, these individuals were retested in a subsequent 
  session. If the blood pressure was elevated for consecutive
  measurements, the student’s blood pressure was remeasured at least 2 weeks
  later. If this measurement also revealed consecutive elevated blood pressure,
  the student was scheduled for a third and final blood pressure assessment. The
  names of students whose blood pressure remained elevated on three
  separate measurement occasions were given to school nurses for follow-up. Blood pressure 
	for these students was measured in the privacy of the nurse’s office using a mercury
  sphygmomanometer.  This blood pressure screening protocol was designed to
  increase test specificity by reducing false positives while maintaining
  sensitivity for referral. It was also designed to allow a practical and
  sustainable workload that could be continued annually with limited resources.
  	The protocol was designed to investigate the relationship between
  weight status and blood pressure, not to determine the prevalence of
  hypertension. Racial and ethnic classification and date of birth were based on
  self-report and verified with school records for all elementary school
  students. Statistical analyses Stata version 8.2 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Tex) was used to perform
  descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. Binomial regression models
  were generated to explore the associations between weight status and racial
  and ethnic classification and the relationship between weight status and blood
  pressure. To ensure that minimal residual confounding existed, we adjusted
  these models for age and sex. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals (CIs)
  were generated for all risk ratio estimates. Because of the difficulty in
  reconciling the child and adolescent blood pressure classification standards
  with those for adults (18 years and older), blood pressure analyses were
  performed only on students younger than 18 years (n = 745). Blood pressure
  classification for each measurement occasion was based on the last blood
  pressure measurement taken. Back to top ResultsResponseWe screened 769 (37.5%) of 2053 students in the school system for height
  and weight. All but two students were also screened for blood pressure. The
  elementary school response rate was 50.8% (517/1017), the middle school
  response rate was 28.3% (140/494), and the high school response rate was 20.7%
  (112/542). There was a significant  linear trend of decreasing
  participation with increasing grade level (Cochran-Armitage trend test, P
  < .001). Of the participants, 62.4% were American Indian, 27.3% were white,
  6.0% were African American, and 4.3% were Hispanic. One Asian student also
  participated but was excluded from further analyses. The overall response rate
  by racial and ethnic classification did not differ significantly from the
  expected distribution (χ2 goodness-of-fit test,
	χ23 = 6.3,
  P = .10). This lack of racial or ethnic bias held when the data were
  stratified by school status (elementary, χ2 goodness-of-fit 
	test, χ23=
  1.8, P = .61; middle school, χ23 = 5.6, P = .13; high school, χ23 = 2.8, P = .42). Neither was an
  overall sex bias in response rates noted (χ2 goodness-of-fit 
	test, χ21 = .09, P = .92). This lack of sex bias also held when the
  data were stratified by school status (elementary, χ2 goodness-of-fit 
	test, χ21 = 0.0, P = .86; middle school, χ21 = 0.6, P = .43; high school, χ21
	= 0.4, P = .54). Overweight statusTable 1 provides BMI categories by grade level 
	and sex; Table 2 provides BMI
  categories by race and ethnicity. Binomial regression models to examine the
  relationship between weight status and race were adjusted for age and sex
  (Table 3). Overall, 27.9% 
	of the students screened were overweight. American Indians had a higher 
	prevalence of overweight (32.2%) than any other racial or ethnic group. This 
	prevalence was significantly greater than the prevalence for white students 
	when students who were overweight were compared with those of normal or 
	underweight status in a binomial regression model (Table 3). No 
	statistically significant racial or ethnic differences were found for risk 
	of overweight status, but the point estimates for American Indian, African 
	American, and Hispanic students were greater than for white students. A 
	binomial regression model comparing those at risk for overweight or 
	overweight with those of normal or underweight status provides evidence that 
	American Indian and African American students are at significantly greater risk of 
	being more than normal weight than white students (Table 3). Although 
	Hispanic students tended to be heavier than white students, this result was 
	not statistically significant. This comparison is important because risk of becoming
  overweight and being overweight track with similar strength into adult obesity
  (15,17). No statistically significant sex differences in weight status were
  evident; 28.0% of males and 27.8% of females were classified as overweight
  (Pearson χ23= 2.98, P = .40). We found a 
  hint of an increasing linear trend for overweight as grade level increases 
  (Table 1). However, this trend is mitigated by the decrease in overweight seen 
  among high school students when compared with middle school students 
  (Cochran-Armitage trend test, P = .11). When the 
  high school results are excluded, there is a statistically significant 
  increasing trend for overweight as grade level increases (Cochran-Armitage 
	trend test, P = .003). Blood pressure categories From the total sample of 747 students aged less than 18 years, 745 had 
	their blood pressure measured. Two students were not measured for blood 
	pressure because their clothing interfered with the measurement. No student 
	with elevated blood pressure was lost to follow-up. Only data from the 745
  students younger than 18 years were examined further because of the difficulty
  reconciling adult blood pressure standards with those for children and
  adolescents. At the first screening session, 18.4% (137/745) of the students
  had blood pressure at or above the 90th percentile for their age, sex, and
  height. After the second measurement occasion, this percentage was reduced to
  5.1% (38/745), and only 2.8% (21/745) had blood pressure at or above the 90th
  percentile that persisted for three measurement occasions (i.e., three to nine
  consecutive measurements.) Association of overweight status and elevated blood pressure A strong association was seen between students with a BMI at or above the
  85th percentile and blood pressure  at or above the 90th percentile on
  the first measurement occasion (Table 4). This association gained strength as
  elevated blood pressure persisted with repeated blood pressure measurements,
  with the second measurement occasion providing a crude relative risk (RR) of 5.95 (95% CI,
  2.52–14.07) and the third a crude RR of 6.70 (95% CI, 1.99–22.55) (data not 
  shown). Small
  numbers of students with elevated blood pressure prevented regression modeling
  for these subsequent measurements. Back to top DiscussionResponse rates The response rates were reasonable but far from ideal. Volunteer bias may
  have substantially skewed the observed prevalence rates for overweight. It is
  possible that this was the case for older students in middle school and
  high school. A result of this bias might be an underestimation of the 
	prevalence rates for underweight, risk of overweight, and overweight. Weight 
	consciousness and autonomy from parental influence arguably increase with 
	age, and therefore older overweight students may have been less
  likely to participate in the screening than normal weight students. The
  cross-sectional decline in overweight prevalence between the middle and high
  school cohorts also indicates that there was an underrepresentation of overweight students among those screened and that this
  underrepresentation may have increased with age. The apparent decline could
  also be a cohort effect; however, anecdotal evidence from school personnel
  indicates that many overweight students in high school and middle school
  did not participate in the screening. Recent statewide results from Arkansas
  may indicate that a reduction in overweight among high school students is a
  real phenomenon, but the decline is not discussed (7). Low to moderate response rates could lead to biased prevalence rates for
  elevated blood pressure.  An underrepresentation of overweight students
  could definitely have this effect, but despite low response rates, the
  association between elevated blood pressure and elevated weight should remain
  unbiased. Overweight status The results of the weight status screening provide important information 
	for the participants, parents, and school district. The prevalence of 
	overweight among the participants is nearly twice that of recent national 
	rates, rates already considered epidemic (5). The prevalence of overweight 
	among the American Indian participants is more than twice the national
  prevalence estimates for the general school-aged population. Even among white
  participants, usually seen as at less risk for overweight than American
  Indians, African Americans, or Hispanics, the prevalence of overweight was
  greater than national rates for children and adolescents. The overweight
  prevalence rate for white participants (18.1%) was the lowest by racial and
  ethnic classification but was still substantially greater than recent national
  prevalence estimates of approximately 15.4% for children and adolescents and
  much greater than the Healthy People 2010 objective of less than or
  equal to 5% (5,30). A unique aspect of the overweight prevalence data for the Anadarko public
  schools is that it provides an opportunity to compare the overweight status of
  American Indian and white students living in the same integrated
  community. Although many potential confounders exist, it is notable that
  American Indian students had a significantly increased risk of being
  overweight compared with their white peers (Table 3). Explanations for
  this difference are yet to be determined. Biological and cultural differences
  are strong possibilities (4). Economic factors may also play a role; whereas
  54% of white students were eligible for free or reduced-price lunches, 85% of
  American Indian, 85% of African American, and 90% of Hispanic students were
  eligible. However, a recent large-scale investigation has shown that food
  insecurity, a corollary of poverty, is associated with lower BMIs in children
  (31). Another recent investigation has provided evidence that community
  availability of fitness facilities and other venues for activity is positively
  associated with healthy weight (32). However, the fact that the students all
  live in the same community diminishes the possibility that access to
  sidewalks, parks, playgrounds, fast-food outlets, or grocery stores is an
  explanatory factor. Blood pressure statusOnly 2.8% of the students had elevated blood pressure (≥90th
  percentile) that persisted over three measurement sessions and multiple blood
  pressure readings. However, the National High Blood Pressure Education Program
  Working Group on Hypertension Control in Children and Adolescents stated that
  it should be expected that less than 1% of children and adolescents will be
  diagnosed as hypertensive when multiple measurements are taken over weeks or
  months. Doubling this expected percentage to extrapolate to the 90th
  percentile indicates that there may be an excess prevalence of elevated blood
  pressure among these students. However, the unique protocol and electronic
  blood pressure monitors used for this screening may underestimate the
  prevalence of elevated blood pressure compared to using averaged measurements
  with a mercury sphygmomanometer. Because of the low yield from screening children for hypertension,
  recommendations against universal screening have been made (33,34). However,
  these recommendations were based on the need for highly trained personnel
  using mercury sphygmomanometers. The advent of high-quality electronic blood
  pressure monitors, combined with the epidemic of obesity, may have changed the
  cost–benefit equation for blood pressure screening. In fact, recent research
  supports the premise that rates of hypertension may be increasing among
  children but that normative data based on electronic oscillometric blood 
	pressure measurement are needed for future screening efforts (8). Association of overweight status and elevated blood pressure Although the prevalence of elevated blood pressure in the Anadarko public
  schools is difficult to interpret, the consistent and strong association of
  high BMI with elevated blood pressure may presage future increases in
  child, adolescent, and adult hypertension if the prevalence of obesity is
  sustained or increases (20,35). Impact We presented the data in this paper to the principals, superintendent, and
  other interested school personnel of the Anadarko public school system. Their
  response has been positive and demonstrative of the often-forgotten altruism inherent in America’s public schools. The middle school
  implemented a school-based walking program for sixth graders in the 2002 to 2003 school year. The high school implemented and evaluated a
  school-based student walking program during the second half of the 2002 to
  2003 school year. Lastly, the district has decided to commit resources to
  perform weight and blood pressure screening annually as part of
  usual student health activities and to examine cost vs benefits and effectiveness of this activity. Back to top AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank the students, parents, staff, faculty, and administration
  of the Anadarko public schools for their cooperation, collaboration, and
  support. This journal article and the research it describes were funded
  through the CDC Prevention Research Centers’ cooperative agreements with 
	University of Oklahoma Prevention Research Center, no. U48/CCU610817 and no. 
	1-U48-DP-000026. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and
  do not necessarily represent the official views of CDC, the Anadarko School
  District, or the Anadarko community. Back to top Author InformationCorresponding Author: William E. Moore, University of Oklahoma Prevention
  Research Center, 800 NE 15th St, Room 532, Oklahoma City, OK 73104. Telephone:
  405-271-2330, ext 46718. E-mail: William-Moore@ouhsc.edu. Author Affiliations: Aietah Stephens, Terry Wilson, Wesley Wilson, June E.
  Eichner, University of Oklahoma Prevention Research Center, Oklahoma City,
  Okla. Back to top References
The Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy. 17th ed. San Diego (CA): Merck Research
  Laboratories; 1999.Mokdad AH, Bowman BA, Ford ES, Vinicor F, Marks JS, Koplan JP. 
	The
  continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States. JAMA
  2001;286(10):1195-200.Mokdad AH, Serdula MK, Dietz WH, Bowman BA, Marks JS, Koplan JP. 
	The
  spread of the obesity epidemic in the United States, 1991-1998. JAMA
  1999;282(16):1519-22.Story M, Evans M, Fabsitz RR, Clay TE, Holy Rock B, Broussard B.
	The
  epidemic of obesity in American Indian communities and the need for childhood
  obesity-prevention programs. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69(4 Suppl):747S-754S.National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2002 with 
	chartbook on trends in the health of Americans. Hyattsville (MD): National 
	Center for Health Statistics; 2002.Strauss RS, Pollack HA. 
	Epidemic increase in childhood overweight,
  1986-1998. JAMA 2001;286(22):2845-8.Arkansas Center for Health Improvement. The Arkansas assessment of
  childhood and adolescent obesity [Internet]. Little Rock (AK): Arkansas Center 
	for Health Improvement. Available from: http://www.achi.net/current_initiatives/bmi/default.asp 
    *Sorof JM, Lai D, Turner J, Poffenbarger T, Portman RJ. 
	Overweight,
  ethnicity, and the prevalence of hypertension in school-aged children.
  Pediatrics 2004;113(3 Pt 1):475-82.Hoelscher DM, Day RS, Lee ES, Frankowski RF, Kelder SH, Ward JL, et al.
	Measuring the prevalence of overweight in Texas schoolchildren.
  Am J Public Health 2004;94(6):1002-8.
Baranowski T,
	
Cooper DM,
	
Harrell J,
	
Hirst K,
	
Kaufman FR,
	
Goran M, 
	et al; The STOPP-T2D Prevention Study Group. 
	Presence of diabetes risk factors
  in a large U.S. eighth-grade cohort. Diabetes Care 2006;29(2):212-7.Wang G, Dietz W.
	Economic burden of obesity in youths aged 6 to 17 years: 1979-1999. 
	Pediatrics 2002;109(5):E81-1.Rosenbloom A, Joe J, Young R, Winter W.
	Emerging epidemic of type 2
  diabetes in youth. Diabetes Care 1999;22(2):345-54.American Diabetes Association. 
	Type 2 diabetes in children and
  adolescents. Diabetes Care 2000;23(3):381-9.Nieto FJ, Szklo M, Comstock GW. 
	Childhood weight and growth rate as
  predictors of adult mortality. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136(2):201-13.Serdula MK, Ivery D, Coates RJ, Freedman DS, Williamson DF, Byers T.
	Do
  obese children become obese adults? A review of the literature. Prev Med 
	1993;22(2):167-77.Troiano RP, Flegal KM. 
	Overweight children and adolescents:
  description, epidemiology, and demographics. Pediatrics 1998;101:497-504.Whitaker RC, Wright JA, Pepe MS, Seidel KD, Dietz WH.
	Predicting
  obesity in young adulthood from childhood and parental obesity. N Eng J Med
  1997;337:869-73.Daniels SR. 
	Cardiovascular sequelae of childhood hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2002;15(2 
	Pt 2):61S-63S.Gilbert TJ, Percy CA, Sugarman JR, Benson L, Percy C. 
	Obesity among
  Navajo adolescents. Relationship to dietary intake and blood pressure. Am J Dis Child 1992;146(3):289-95.Lauer RM, Clarke WR. 
	Childhood risk factors for high adult blood
  pressure: the Muscatine Study. Pediatrics 1989;84(4):633-41.Percy C, Freedman DS, Gilbert TJ, White L, Ballew C, Mokdad A.
	Prevalence of hypertension among Navajo Indians: findings from the Navajo
  Health and Nutrition Survey. J Nutr 1997;127(10 Suppl):2114S-2119S.Rocchini AP. 
	Obesity hypertension. Am J Hypertens 2002;15(2 
	Pt 2):50S-52S.Gidding SS, Bao W, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. 
	Effects of secular
  trends in obesity on coronary risk factors in children: the Bogalusa Heart
  Study. J Pediatr 1995;127(6):868-74.Freedman DS, Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS. 
	The relation of
  overweight to cardiovascular risk factors among children and adolescents: the
  Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics 1999;103(6 Pt 1):1175-82.U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
  School district demographics system. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Education, Institute of
  Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics; 2006. Available
  from: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/sdds/U.S. Census Bureau. Profile of general demographic characteristics:
  2000. Anadarko City, Oklahoma. Washington (DC): U.S. Census Bureau; 2002.Oklahoma State Department of Education, Office of Accountability and 
	Assessments. School report card. Oklahoma City (OK): Oklahoma State 
	Department of Education; 2001.Dean AG, Arner TG, Sangam S, Sunki GG, Friedman R, Lantinga M, et al.
  Epi Info 2000, a database and statistics program for public health
  professionals. Atlanta
  (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2000.National High Blood Pressure Education Program, Working Group on
  Hypertension Control in Children and Adolescents. 
	Update on the 1987 task
  force report on high blood pressure in children in children and adolescents: a
  working group report from the national high blood pressure education program.
	Pediatrics 1996;98(4 Pt 1):649-58.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2010: with
  understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health. 2nd
  ed. Washington (DC): U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000.Rose D, Bodor JN.
	Household food insecurity and overweight status in
  young school children: results from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study.
  Pediatrics 2006;117(2):464-73.Gordon-Larsen P, Nelson MC, Page P, Popkin BM.
	Inequality in the
  built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and
  obesity. Pediatrics 2006;117:417-24.Fixler DE, Laird WP, Fitzgerald V, Stead S, Adams R.
	Hypertension
  screening in schools: results of the Dallas study. Pediatrics 1979;63(1):32-6.Rames LK, Clarke WR, Connor WE, Reiter MA, Lauer RM.
	Normal blood
  pressures and the evaluation of sustained pressure elevation in childhood: the
  Muscatine Study. Pediatrics 1978;61(2):245-51.Lauer RM, Clarke WR, Beaglehole R.
	Level, trend, and variability
  of blood pressure during childhood: the Muscatine study. Circulation
  1984;69(2):242-9. Back to top | 
 |