Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Shared Use of Physical Activity Facilities Among North Carolina Faith Communities, 2013

ORIGINAL RESEARCH — Volume 14 — February 2, 2017

PEER REVIEWED

Figure. Counties represented by the faith communities that responded to the survey on sharing facilities for physical activity, North Carolina, 2013.

No. of Respondents County
0 Avery, Bertie, Bladen, Brunswick, Buncombe, Burke, Caldwell, Camden, Carteret, Caswell, Clay, Columbus, Craven, Currituck, Dare, Duplin, Franklin, Gates, Graham, Granville, Greene, Halifax, Haywood, Hertford, Hoke, Jackson, Jones, Lenoir, Lincoln, Madison, Martin, Mitchell, Northampton, Onslow, Pamlico, Pasquotank, Pender, Perquimans, Stokes, Swain, Transylvania, Tyrrell, Union, Vance, Washington, Wilson, Yancey
1–5 Alamance, Alexander, Alleghany, Anson, Ashe, Beaufort, Cabarrus, Catawba, Chatham, Cherokee, Chowan, Cleveland, Cumberland, Davie, Durham, Henderson, Hyde, Johnston, Macon, McDowell, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Moore, New Hanover, Orange, Person, Pitt, Polk, Randolph, Richmond, Robeson, Rockingham, Rowan, Rutherford, Sampson, Scotland, Stanly, Surry, Warren, Watauga, Wayne, Wilkes, Yadkin
6–9 Davidson, Edgecombe, Gaston, Iredell, Nash
10–30 Forsyth, Guilford, Harnett, Lee, Wake

Return to Article

Top

The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions.
Top