Open joint injury

From WikEM
Jump to: navigation, search

Background

  • Also known as "traumatic arthrotomy"
  • Soft tissue injury that penetrates the joint space and exposes the joint space to the environment.
  • Increases the risk of joint infection and is cause for emergent orthopedic evaluation and treatment for joint exploration and washout.
  • Rarely life threatening:
    • Evaluate other injuries that may cause immediate loss of life/limb first.
    • Evaluate nearby neurovascular structures.
  • Maintain high suspicion for periarticular penetrating injuries to involve the joint:
    • Septic arthritis is a potentially very morbid sequela of untreated open joints.

Clinical Features

  • Concern for joint space involvement with soft tissue injury:
    • Proximity of soft tissue injury to joint
    • Visible joint capsule surface
    • Periarticular fracture
  • In these situations joint involvement is obvious and orthopedic surgery/washout is necessary without further testing:
    • Foreign body in joint on X-ray
    • Intra-articular air on X-ray or CT
    • Obvious joint involvement of fracture with an open fracture on X-ray

Differential Diagnosis

Extremity trauma

Evaluation

  • ATLS
  • X-ray
  • CT – look for air in joint
  • Trauma labs PRN
  • Those in which joint penetration is unclear can have joint loaded with either saline or methylene blue to look for extravasation from wound.
    • Debate on sensitivity and specificity – some say sensitivity is far too low.
    • However, negative joint loading test was associated with 0% infection rate in one study with non-operative management.[1]
    • For knees, 50 mL is standard (sensitivity 46%, increased with ROM).
      • >195 mL loading (very painful) needed for 95% sensitivity in small lacerations near the knee.[2]
    • For elbows, 20 mL with range of motion gave 86% sensitivity, 40 mL gave 95%.[3]
    • For ankle, 10 mL is average needed, 23 mL and 30 mL for 90% and 95% sensitivity.[4]
    • Another recent study suggests air in joint on CT of periarticular joint fracture is 95% sensitive for open joint and could potentially be used instead of joint loading(level III)[5]

Management

Pain control

Opioid of choice

Wound management

  • Initial immobilization as needed
  • Orthopedic "Golden 6 hours" – applies similarly to open fractures. Treat <6 hours with surgical debridement and washout
  • Can irrigate grossly contaminated wounds in ED
  • Tetanus prophylaxis

Prophylactic Antibiotics

Depends on concern for infection (similar to open fractures)[6]

Disposition

Admit to trauma or orthopedic surgery

See Also

External Links

General overview of joint loading test with methylene blue

References

  1. ↑ Konda, S. R., Howard, D., Davidovitch, R. I. & Egol, K. A. The saline load test of theknee redefined: a test to detect traumatic arthrotomies and rule out periarticular wounds not requiring surgical intervention. J. Orthop. Trauma 27, 491–497 (2013).
  2. ↑ Keese, G. R., Boody, A. R., Wongworawat, M. D. & Jobe, C. M. The accuracy of the saline load test in the diagnosis of traumatic knee arthrotomies. J. Orthop. Trauma 21, 442–443 (2007).
  3. ↑ Feathers, T. et al. Effectiveness of the saline load test in diagnosis of traumatic elbow arthrotomies. J. Trauma 71, E110–113 (2011).
  4. ↑ Bariteau, J. T., Blankenhorn, B. D. & Digiovanni, C. W. Evaluation of saline load test for simulated traumatic arthrotomies of the ankle. Injury 44, 1498–1501 (2013).
  5. ↑ Konda, S. R., Davidovitch, R. I. & Egol, K. A. Computed tomography scan to detect traumatic arthrotomies and identify periarticular wounds not requiring surgical intervention: an improvement over the saline load test. J. Orthop. Trauma 27, 498–504 (2013).
  6. ↑ Gosselin, R. A., Roberts, I. & Gillespie, W. J. Antibiotics for preventing infection in open limb fractures. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. CD003764 (2004).