Actions & Recommendations
In October, 2015, TATFAR revised its work plan and identified 20 actions for continued collaboration through 2020.
Actions for 2016 through 2020 are currently being implemented.
Acronyms
AMR – antimicrobial resistance
ASPR – Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response
BARDA – Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
CDC – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CFIA –Canadian Food Inspection Agency
CIHR – Canadian Institutes of Health Research
CLSI – Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute
COMBACTE – Combatting Bacterial Resistance in Europe
DG RTD – Directorate-General for Research and Innovation
DG SANTE – Directorate-General for Health and Consumers
DHHS – Department of Health and Human Services
DoD – Department of Defense
EC – European Commission
ECDC – European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control
EFSA – European Food Safety Authority
EMA – European Medicines Agency
FDA – Food and Drug Administration
FHI – Norwegian Institute of Public Health (also called NIPH)
GLASS – Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System
HC – Health Canada
MDR – multi-drug resistant
NIAID – National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
NIH – National Institutes of Health
NMA –Norwegian Medicines Agency
NVI – Norwegian Veterinary Institute
OGA – Office of Global Affairs
PHAC – Public Health Agency of Canada
USDA – United States Department of Agriculture
Key Area I. Appropriate therapeutic use in human and veterinary medicine
Action Number | Description | Implementer Organizations |
---|---|---|
1.1 |
Develop guidance for assessing appropriate antibiotic use
|
CDC, DoD, ECDC, FHI, PHAC |
1.2 |
Publish a review of antibiotic reduction goals in human medicine from TATFAR partner countries
|
CDC, ECDC, FHI, PHAC |
1.3 |
Continue the coordination of campaigns to promote appropriate antibiotic use in human medicine
|
CDC, ECDC, FHI, PHAC |
1.4 |
Cooperate in the development of methodology for measuring and reporting the consumption of antimicrobials per species in veterinary medicine
|
CFIA, DG SANTE, EFSA, EMA, FDA, NVI, USDA |
1.5 |
Collaborate on implementation of the Guidelines for Risk Analysis of Foodborne Antimicrobial Resistance prepared by Codex Alimentarius
|
CFIA, DG SANTE, EFSA, EMA, FDA, ECDC, NVI, PHAC |
1.6 |
Enhance information sharing on approaches to promoting appropriate use in veterinary communities
|
CDC, CFIA, DG SANTE, EFSA, EMA, FDA, NVI, PHAC, USDA |
1.7 |
Cooperate in the areas of research and surveillance aiming to improve understanding of foodborne transmission of bacteria resistant to certain classes of antimicrobials
|
CDC, CFIA, DG RTD, DG SANTE, EFSA, EMA, FDA, ECDC, NVI, PHAC USDA |
1.8 |
Cooperatein improving understanding of the impact on public and animal health of restricting certain uses of antimicrobial drugs in food-producing animals
|
CDC, CFIA, DG RTD, DG SANTE, ECDC, EFSA, FDA, USDA |
Key Area II. Prevention of drug-resistant infections
Action Number | Description | Implementer Organizations |
---|---|---|
2.1 |
Consultation and collaboration on a point-prevalence survey (PPS) for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs)
|
CDC, ECDC, FHI, PHAC |
2.2 |
Develop a common system for sharing and analyzing bacterial resistance patterns for pathogens identified as urgent and serious threats
|
CDC, DoD, ECDC, FHI, PHAC |
2.3 |
Develop a rapid alert system for communication of new or novel antimicrobial resistance findings
|
CDC, DoD, ECDC, FHI, PHAC |
2.4 |
Encourage efforts to harmonise interpretive criteria for susceptibility reporting of bacterial isolates for contribution of data to the WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS)
|
CDC, ECDC, FDA, FHI, PHAC, other partners |
2.5 |
Coordinate guidance for detection of outbreaks or concerning resistance trends and appropriate response
|
CDC, ECDC, FHI, PHA |
Key Area III. Strategies for improving the pipeline of new antimicrobial drugs
Action Number | Description | Implementer Organizations |
---|---|---|
3.1 |
Communicate on the development of a package of economic incentives that could effectively incentivize antibacterial therapy development
|
BARDA, CIHR, DG RTD, DG SANTE, FHI, Industry Canada |
3.2 |
Conduct a feasibility assessment of options for pull incentives and development of a potential joint incentive mechanism
|
BARDA, CIHR, DG RTD, DG SANTE, FHI, Industry Canada |
3.3 |
Foster international research and product development to address challenging problems in the management of AR
|
BARDA, CIHR, DG RTD, FHI, NIH |
3.4 |
Regulatory agencies discuss common issues in refining and furthering the science of antibacterial drug development and regulation, including clinical trial design to facilitate the development of antibacterial drugs and maintain a single development program that can be utilized by both regulatory authorities
|
EMA, FDA, HC, NMA |
3.5 |
Continue regular meetings between FDA and EMA to discuss common issues in the area of antibacterial drug development and regulation
|
EMA, FDA, HC, NMA |
3.6 |
Exchange information on possible regulatory approaches to the development of alternatives for managing bacterial infections, such as bacteriophage therapy and vaccines for healthcare-associated infections
|
EMA, FDA, HC, NMA |
3.7 |
Veterinary regulatory agencies will discuss the particular challenges related to authorisation of novel veterinary therapies presented as alternatives to antimicrobials
|
CFIA, DG SANTE, EMA, FDA, HC, Norway, USDA |
- Page last reviewed: August 18, 2017
- Page last updated: August 18, 2017
- Content source: