|
|
|||||||||
|
Persons using assistive technology might not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, please send e-mail to: mmwrq@cdc.gov. Type 508 Accommodation and the title of the report in the subject line of e-mail. Incidence of Treatment for End-Stage Renal Disease Attributed to Diabetes Mellitus -- United States, 1980-1989End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is defined as renal insufficiency requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation for survival. In the United States, diabetes mellitus is the major cause of ESRD (1). This report summarizes trends during the 1980s in the incidence of treatment for ESRD attributable to diabetes mellitus (ESRD-DM). * Because 90% of ESRD treatment in the United States is reimbursed by Medicare's ESRD program, Medicare's medical information system has been used for surveillance of ESRD-DM (2,3). Incidence is defined as the initiation of treatment for ESRD-DM. ** Estimates of the number of persons with diabetes were derived from CDC's National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and were used in the calculation of rates (3). Because of limitations in the sample size of the NHIS, race-specific analysis in this report is presented only for blacks and whites. Rates were age-adjusted by the direct method (4) using the estimated 1980 population of persons with diabetes as the standard. From 1980 through 1989, new cases of ESRD-DM increased from 2220 to 13,332. Similarly, the age-adjusted incidence of ESRD-DM increased more than fivefold, from 38.4 to 202.0 per 100,000 persons with diabetes. Although the incidence varied inversely with age, age differences narrowed during the decade because incidence increased at a greater rate among the older age groups (Figure 1). Incidence among persons with diabetes increased threefold among those aged less than 45 years but increased 12-fold among those aged greater than or equal to 75 years. The age-adjusted incidence of ESRD-DM was greater for blacks with diabetes than for whites with diabetes and highest for black females with diabetes (Figure 2). In 1989, the age-adjusted ESRD-DM incidence for black males was 1.4 times that for white males (284.6 versus 201.3 per 100,000 persons with diabetes), and the ESRD-DM incidence for black females was 2.3 times that for white females (352.8 versus 150.8 per 100,000 persons with diabetes). Among whites with diabetes, the incidence was greater in males than females. Among blacks with diabetes, during 1985-1986, the incidence in black females began to exceed that in black males. The rate of increase in ESRD-DM incidence was similar for blacks and whites but was higher for females than for males (approximately fivefold versus fourfold increase). Reported by: Div of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC. Editorial NoteEditorial Note: The dramatic increase in occurrence of ESRD-DM during the 1980s may have reflected increases both in the incidence and in the treatment of this problem. Use of treatment may be influenced not only by availability but also by changes in the definition of eligibility for treatment (3). In addition, because Medicare does not reimburse approximately 10% of ESRD treatment and does not include as incident cases those persons who are neither candidates for treatment nor who choose not to be treated (3), the number of cases may be underreported. Age-specific differences in incidence of ESRD-DM decreased during the decade because of greater increases in rates among older age groups. Because ESRD cases attributed to noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) are more frequent in older age groups, the increased incidence in these age groups suggests that ESRD-DM associated with NIDDM is increasing (5). The findings in this report indicate that the incidence of ESRD-DM was higher among blacks than whites. Rates for the incidence of ESRD and ESRD-DM among other minority groups are also higher than for whites (6). Factors accounting for these differences may include greater severity of diabetes, higher prevalence of hypertension, higher prevalence of uncontrolled diabetes and hypertension, and lack of access to preventive care and treatment (3,6,7). Three levels of prevention efforts may help reduce the incidence of ESRD-DM. The first is the primary prevention of NIDDM (5), which accounts for 90%-95% of all incident cases of diabetes. Effective interventions using dietary and physical activity strategies are needed for persons in minority groups and others who may be at high risk for the development of NIDDM (5). The second level is the prevention of diabetic nephropathy, which is the precursor to ESRD-DM. Although strategies for preventing diabetic nephropathy are not well established (8,9), the efficacy of controlling hyperglycemia as a means for preventing diabetic nephropathy is being assessed by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases in its Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (10). The third level of prevention efforts is to slow the progression of diabetic nephropathy to ESRD-DM. These efforts should focus on detecting early markers of renal disease and offering at-risk persons intensive interventions, which include
References
Disclaimer All MMWR HTML documents published before January 1993 are electronic conversions from ASCII text into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices. **Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.Page converted: 08/05/98 |
|||||||||
This page last reviewed 5/2/01
|