Persons using assistive technology might not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, please send e-mail to: mmwrq@cdc.gov. Type 508 Accommodation and the title of the report in the subject line of e-mail.
Public Health Dispatch: Potential Risk for Lead Exposure in Dental Offices
In December 2000, the Washington State Health Department discovered white
powder that was found to be lead oxide in boxes used to store dental intraoral
radiograph film. The Washington State Health Department alerted state health departments
throughout the United States. Subsequently, the Wisconsin Division of Public Health
(WDPH) conducted an investigation of dental offices in the state. This report summarizes
the investigation, which indicated that similar storage boxes are used in Wisconsin.
The findings indicate that patients are at risk for exposure to a substantial amount of
lead during a dental radiograph procedure if the office stores dental film in these boxes.
During January--March 2001, radiation safety inspectors in Wisconsin visited
240 (9%) of 2,748 dental offices with radiograph equipment. Of these, 43 (18%) stored
radiograph film in table-top, lead-lined boxes. Of 11 dental offices in use for >20 years,
four (36%) used this storage method.
The boxes were usually made of wood and shaped like a shoe box. All boxes
contained a white powder residue. A bulk sample of the residue contained 77% lead
identified as lead oxide. Visits to dental offices occurred before and after a mailing had
been sent by WDPH to all dental offices with radiograph equipment warning about
possible lead exposure and recommending that lead-lined storage boxes be discarded.
Many offices discarded the boxes before the inspection. In one office, after receiving the
warning, paper was placed in the bottom of the box and film was placed on top of the paper.
In another office, dental instruments had been placed in the box. Other offices used
a vertical wall-mounted, lead-lined film dispensing box. Some of these boxes and the
film in them also contained lead.
A mock dental radiograph procedure was performed during which wipes were
placed on the tips of a dental hygienist's fingers whenever a patient's mouth was
touched. Analysis of these wipe samples found
3,378µg lead that could have been
transferred from the hygienist's fingers to a patient's mouth. Lead also could have been
introduced directly from the film. Wipe samples of eight film packets from two dental offices
that used the lead-lined storage boxes identified average lead levels of
3,352µg (range:
262µg--34,000µg). During a typical radiographic procedure, usually conducted once
per year, >4 separate views are taken. When children's teeth develop to the point
where adjacent teeth touch (usually age 3 years), radiographs may be taken if the
dentist suspects decay.
Because of the increased susceptibility of children and the developing fetus
(1), lead exposure is particularly dangerous for children and for women who are or may
soon become pregnant. The approximate half-life of lead in blood is 25 days
(2); as a result, the window for identifying lead exposure following dental radiographs is a few
months. Health-care providers who discover high blood lead levels of unexplained origin
should consider this possible route of exposure.
Advances in dental radiograph technology have reduced scatter radiation---the
reason for protective boxes---making lead-lined radiograph storage boxes
unnecessary. Because lead oxide cannot be removed adequately, the film packets stored in
lead-lined boxes and the film packets stored in them should be discarded.
Reported by: M Chamberlain, M Bunge, W Otto, HA Anderson, MD, State
Epidemiologist, Bur of Environmental Health; N McKenney, MS, W LeMay, DDS, Wisconsin Div of
Public Health. Lead Poisoning Prevention Br, Div of Environmental Hazards and Health
Effects, National Center for Environmental Health; and an EIS Officer, CDC.
References
Chisolm JJ, O'Hara DM. Lead absorption in children. Baltimore, Maryland: Urban
& Schwarzenberg, 1982.
Hu H. Heavy metal poisoning. In: Fauci AS, ed. Harrison's principles of internal
medicine. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998:2565--6.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are
provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply
endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content
of pages found at these sites.
Disclaimer
All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from ASCII text
into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version.
Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the electronic PDF version and/or
the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables.
An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents,
U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800.
Contact GPO for current prices.
**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to
mmwrq@cdc.gov.
