Differences in Methodology
Different approaches were used to construct the 2000 CDC and 2006 WHO growth charts for children from birth up to 2 years and include differences in the
- Data sources.
- Type and frequency of data collection.
- Sample sizes.
- Exclusion criteria.
- Breastfeeding rates among infants in the sample.
- Use of cross-sectional data to construct the CDC charts versus longitudinal data to construct the WHO growth charts.
Comparison of sample populations used to create the CDC and WHO growth curves for children younger than aged 2 years | ||
---|---|---|
CDC Growth Reference (2000) | WHO Growth Standard (2006) | |
Data sources |
| Multicenter Growth Reference Study (longitudinal component) |
Type and frequency of data collection | Cross-sectional data on weight and length starting at age 2 mos, with mathematical models used to connect birth weights and lengths to survey data | Longitudinal data with measurements of weight and length at birth; 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks; and 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 mos |
Sample size | 4,697 observations for 4,697 distinct children | 18,973 observations for 903 distinct children |
Exclusion criteria | Very low birth weight (<1,500 g [<3 lbs, 4 oz]) |
|
Infant feeding | 50% ever breastfed 33% breastfed at 3 mos |
|
- Page last reviewed: April 15, 2015
- Page last updated: April 15, 2015
- Content source: